Skip to main content

Advertisement

Download PDF

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (1.5 ATA) in treating sports related TBI/CTE: two case reports

Medical Gas Research volume 1, Article number: 17 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Despite adequate evidence, including randomized controlled trials; hyperbaric oxygen is not yet recognized as efficacious for treating various forms of brain injury, specifically traumatic brain injury. Political-economic issues have kept this benign therapy from being widely adopted despite the lack of viable alternatives. Two football players with TBI/CTE are herewith shown to benefit from being treated with hyperbaric oxygen as documented by neurocognitive examinations and functional brain imaging, in one case treatment commenced decades after the brain injury. Perhaps the interest in HBOT by those participating in high-risk sports will help expand this orphan therapy into mainstream medicine.

Background

Many more concussions were being reported in the National Football League (NFL) in the 2010 season. A total of 154 concussions, including practices and games, were reported from the start of the preseason through the eighth week of the 2010 regular season.

That is an increase of 21 percent over the 127 concussions during the same span in 2009, and a 34 percent jump from the 115 reported through the eighth week of the 2008 season. (Associated Press, Dec 13, 2010)

This either means better reporting is taking place or the game is getting more violent or some combination of the above. What hasn't changed is a lack of treatment. The lack of appropriate treatment for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is not exclusive to the NFL by any means, but football players both young high school students and old retired NFL veterans are beginning to ask for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) to help them recover from their injuries.

Is this a new fad for a therapy looking for a disease, after all if HBOT were efficacious in treating TBI/CTE wouldn't everyone in the medical profession know about it, and wouldn't there be chambers connected to every trauma center?

HBOT has been treating brain injuries as far back as 1963, when it was first found effective in treating carbon monoxide poisoning [1, 2]. Although the misconception that HBOT is only treating carboxy-hemoglobin persists to this day [3]. Brain injuries caused by decompression sickness and arterial gas emboli began being treated by HBOT using Navy Treatment Table six [4, 5]. Delayed treatment (3 months) of an ischemic stroke with HBOT was reported by the US Navy in 1969 [6]. Subsequently successful treatment with HBOT for late treatment of a stroke, diabetic encephalopathy and near-drowning/global anoxia was also reported [7] with the additional evidence of pre and post functional brain imaging (SPECT). The medical literature continues to grow showing HBOT is efficacious in treated old carbon monoxide poisoning (COP) also known as delayed neuropsychiatric syndrome (DNS) of COP [8, 9].

While the historic literature points to HBOT as being efficacious for many conditions, HBOT is an orphan therapy that falls outside of the medical paradigm where drugs and interventions are selectively fed into the standard-of-care/reimbursement complex by corporate interests that control both medical information and clinical practice trends. A therapy that exists outside our dysfunctional medical paradigm tends to be but a footnote that is passed over, buried or ignored completely.

Despite controlled randomized trials demonstrating HBOT's efficacy for treating TBI, ignoring HBOT for treating brain injuries seems to have became codified even though other forms of intervention have fallen short. High quality clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of HBOT in brain injury eventually get buried or forgotten. Sometimes, those who don't understand the nuance of oxygen dose or timing perform studies and resulting misinterpreted results further marginalize this important tool for treating brain injury [10].

Recent clinical research has demonstrated the efficacy of HBOT (at 1.5 ata) for traumatic brain injury, even when administered years after injury.

While in acute severe TBI, HBOT has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality,[11] Harch et al. demonstrated consistent SPECT brain imaging improvements (showing improved brain blood flow) in chronic TBI patients treated with HBOT 1.5 [12–15]. Since the original work of Drs. Neubauer and Harch, the efficacy of HBOT 1.5 in a chronic stable TBI has been well documented [16, 17]. Patients with abnormal functional brain scans secondary to TBI show consistent improvement after HBOT 1.5.

Recently, Harch et al reported dramatic improvement in a series of 15 patients treated with HBOT 1.5 in a clinical trial of military acquired TBI [18]. Functional brain scans continue to document results for HBOT 1.5 for combat related blast related TBI [19]. In two airmen with pre-injury neuropsychiatric testing and chronic stable TBI symptoms, HBOT 1.5 resulted in resolution of symptoms as well as a return to the pre-injury values for testing [20]. In a randomized controlled trial of stable severe TBI treated with HBOT 1.5 Lin et al demonstrated improvement in the Glasgow Coma Scale [21]. Rockswold has demonstrated improvement in the Glasgow Coma Scale and reduced mortality in acute TBI patients undergoing HBOT with minimal risk [22, 23]. HBOT 1.5 in this group of acute patients appears safe and does not produce oxygen toxicity [24]. Other individual trials also have demonstrated the efficacy of HBOT 1.5 for chronic stable TBI [25]. A 310 patient Chinese trial demonstrated improvement clinically, in neuropsychiatric testing, as well as in functional brain imaging after HBOT 1.5 [26]. In a randomized controlled trial of 21 brain-injured adults, HBOT 1.5 resulted in improved neuropsychiatric testing for the treated group [27].

Presented here are two case reports of football induced TBI/CTE that responded to HBOT.

Case presentations

Case 1

A retired NFL player, now in his early 50's, was first hospitalized with a TBI resulting in loss of consciousness during a tackling drill playing pop Warner football.

Numerous minor concussions took place over the years, but he experienced his second major concussion during the first play for his NFL team (San Francisco 49ers) early in the first quarter and went through 25 to 30 smelling salts in order to finish the game. He had no recollection of participating in that game, but was sent back on the practice field the very next day.

Early in his second season (1981), he developed hydrocephalus, and underwent emergency shunt brain surgery. Four months after his team won Super Bowl XVI, his shunt failed, and he had back-to-back emergency brain surgeries and was given last rites. By 1990 he had nine more shunt revisions.

He was treated with HBOT 1.5 times 40 for 60 minutes per treatment (one treatment per day - 100% oxygen). He was independently followed with neurocognitive evaluations and SPECT brain imaging by the Amen Clinic in California. Figure 1 shows a marked improvement in 5 out of 6 indices on the MicroCog assessment done after 40 HBOT sessions. Figure 2 shows the SPECT scan of this former football player.

Figure 1
figure1

Source: MicroCog Assessment- Independent Evaluation by Amen Clinic. (The lower the score on reaction time the better the result).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Pre and post HBOT SPECT imaging showing overall improved blood flow in the post HBOT scan (per Daniel Amen, MD).

Full size image

Case 2

A high school football player age 15 years received two concussions two weeks apart. After the first concussion (1st scrimmage game of the year) he became nauseous, very emotional, broke down after the game, and wanted to quit the team.

A week later he received two head-to-head contacts without loss of consciousness, he was not able to attend school the week following this concussion because of headaches. A CAT scan was negative and his neurologist diagnosed him with migraines.

He lost his ability to read of over the next two weeks and was diagnosed with post-concussion syndrome (PCS) and treated with steroids without clinical response, and then narcotics along with a "black-boxed" anti-depressant.

Three months later he took the IMPACT neurocognitive test, a test originally developed to evaluate sports concussions at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) for their Sports Medicine Concussion Program [28, 29].

The IMPACT software evaluates and documents multiple aspects of neurocognitive functioning including memory, brain processing speed, reaction time and post-concussive symptoms. Furthermore, unlike standard neurocognitive testing modalities, the immediate post-concussion assessment and cognitive testing has shown itself to be a reliable evaluation tool with virtually no practical effect on score stability [30].

He was treated with the identical protocol his retired NFL counterpart was treated with, i.e., HBOT 1.5 × 60 minutes once a day for 40 sessions of 100% oxygen. Figure 3 shows the results of the IMPACT neurocgnitve test on this young football player.

Figure 3
figure3

IMPACT test results for verbal and visual memory pre HBOT, at 20 treatments and at 40 treatments.

Full size image

Without a baseline test prior to the season, it is impossible to know what this player's normal verbal and visual memory scores might have been. All that can be said is that after 40 treatment sessions he is almost matching High school mean scores. His visual motor speed improved 35% and his reaction time improved 25%, which place him better than and at high school mean respectively. Subjectively he experienced an 80% reduction in frequency and severity of headaches and a complete resolution of nausea.

Conclusions

HBOT is the only non-hormonal treatment approved by the FDA for the repair and regeneration of human tissue. Six of the 13 approved indications are directly related to brain injury and wound repair relevant to treating TBI. The USA Olympic team has now brought in HBOT to treat sports related injuries as part of their armamentarium.

The treatment of traumatic brain injury with hyperbaric oxygen is evolving rapidly. A plethora of cellular studies demonstrate the mechanisms of favorable action of HBOT and animal studies have also been able to add to the clinical rationale and utility for treating a variety of traumatic and ischemic brain injuries. Controlled randomized clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of HBOT for traumatic brain injury. Therefore, the time has come for this orphan therapy to be adopted and for it to take its place as standard practice for treating both acute and chronic TBI. High profile athletes who are willing to share their response to HBOT for TBI/CTE may accelerate the day when this benign, humanitarian and non-invasive therapy is recognized as a quintessential tool for treating brain injury; after all, oxygen is what the brain fundamentally feeds upon.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or their legal guardians for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Author Information

KPS is an Adjunct Assistant Professor AT Still University - SOMA.

Abbreviations

ATA:

atmospheres absolute

COP:

carbon monoxide poisoning

CTE:

chronic traumatic encephalopathy

DNS:

delayed neuropsychiatric syndrome

HBOT:

hyperbaric oxygen therapy

IMPACT:

immediate post-concussion assessment and cognitive testing

NFL:

National Football League

PCS:

post concussion syndrome

SPECT:

single-photon emission computed tomography

TBI:

traumatic brain injury.

References

  1. 1.

    Sluiter ME: The treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning by the administration of oxygen at high atmospheric pressure. Proc R Soc Med. 1963, 1002-8. 56

  2. 2.

    Smith G, Sharp GR: Lancet. 1960, 2: 905-

  3. 3.

    Stoller KP: Hyperbaric oxygen and carbon monoxide poisoning: a critical review. Neurological Research. 2007, 29: 146-155. 10.1179/016164107X181770.

  4. 4.

    Duff JH, Shibata HR, Vanschaik L, Usher R, Wigmore RA, MacLean LD: Hyperbaric oxygen: a review of treatment in eighty-three patients. Can Med Assoc J. 1967, 97 (10): 510-5.

  5. 5.

    Workman RD: Oxygen decompression following air dives for use in hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Res Rep 2-64. Rep US Navy Exp Diving Unit. 1964 Dec 15:1-10

  6. 6.

    Hart GB, Thompson RE: The treatment of cerebral ischemia with hyperbaric oxygen (OHP). Stroke. 1971, 2 (3): 247-50. 10.1161/01.STR.2.3.247.

  7. 7.

    Neubauer RA, James P: Cerebral oxygenation and the recoverable brain. Neurol Res. 1998, 20 (Suppl 1): S33-6.

  8. 8.

    Chang DC, Lee JT, Lo CP, Fan YM, Huang KL, Kang BH, Hsieh HL, Chen SY: Hyperbaric oxygen ameliorates delayed neuropsychiatric syndrome of carbon monoxide poisoning. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2010, 37 (1): 23-33.

  9. 9.

    Senol MG, Yildiz S, Ersanli D, Uzun G, Gumus T, Narin Y, Ozkan S, Ayata A: Carbon monoxide-induced cortical visual loss: treatment with hyperbaric oxygen four years later. Med Princ Pract. 2009, 18 (1): 67-9. 10.1159/000163050.

  10. 10.

    Stoller KP: Hyperbaric oxygen and carbon monoxide poisoning: a critical review. Neurological Research. 2007, 29: 146-155. 10.1179/016164107X181770.

  11. 11.

    Clifton GL: Hypothermia and hyperbaric oxygen as treatment modalities for severe head injury. New Horiz. 1995, 3 (3): 474-8. Review

  12. 12.

    Harch PG, Van Meter KW, Gottlieb SF, Staab P: HMPAO SPECT brain imaging and low pressure HBOT in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic traumatic, ischemic, hypoxic and anoxic encephalopathies. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 1994, 21 (Suppl): 30-

  13. 13.

    Harch PG, Van Meter KW, Neubauer RA, Gottlieb SF: Use of HMPAO SPECT for assessment of response to HBO in ischemic/hypoxic encephalopathies. Textbook of Hyperbaric Medicine, Appendix. Edited by: Jain KK. 1996, Seattle (WA): Hogrefe &Huber Pubs, 480-491. 2

  14. 14.

    Harch PG, Neubauer RA: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in global cerebral ischemia/anoxia and coma. Textbook of Hyperbaric Medicine. Edited by: Jain KK. 1999, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle WA, Chapter 18: 319-345. 3

  15. 15.

    Harch PG, Neubauer RA: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in global cerebral ischemia/anoxia and coma. Textbook of Hyperbaric Medicine. Edited by: Jain KK. 1999, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle WA, Chapter 18: 319-345. 3

  16. 16.

    Neubauer RA, Gottlieb SF, Pevsner NH: Hyperbaric Oxygen for Treatment of Closed Head Injury. Southern Medical Journal. 1994, 87 (9): 933-936. 10.1097/00007611-199409000-00015.

  17. 17.

    Barrett KF, Masel BE, Harch PG, Ingram F, Corson KP, Mader JT: Cerebral blood flow changes and cognitive improvement in chronic stable traumatic brain injuries treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Neurol. 1998, A178-A179. Suppl

  18. 18.

    Harch PG, Andrews SR, Fogarty E, Lucarini J, Aubrey C, Staab PK, Van Meter KW: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Treatment of Chronic Mild-Moderate Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury/Post Concussion Syndrome with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: Pilot Trial. Presented at 8th World Congress on Brain Injury. 2010, Washington DC

  19. 19.

    Harch PG, Fogarty EF, Staab PK, Van Meter K: Low pressure hyperbaric oxygen therapy and SPECT brain imaging in the treatment of blast-induced chronic traumatic brain injury (post-concussion syndrome) and post traumatic stress disorder: a case report. Cases J. 2009, 2: 6538-10.4076/1757-1626-2-6538.

  20. 20.

    Wright JK, Zant E, Groom K, Schlegel RE, Gilliland K: Case report: Treatment of mild traumatic brain injury with hyperbaric oxygen. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2009, 36 (6): 391-9.

  21. 21.

    Lin JW, Tsai JT, Lee LM, Lin CM, Hung CC, Hung KS, Chen WY, Wei L, Ko CP, Su YK, Chiu WT: Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on patients with traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008, 101: 145-9. 10.1007/978-3-211-78205-7_25.

  22. 22.

    Rockswold SB, Rockswold GL, Zaun DA, Zhang X, Cerra CE, Bergman TA, Liu J: A prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of hyperbaric to normobaric hyperoxia on cerebral metabolism, intracranial pressure, and oxygen toxicity in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2010, 112 (5): 1080-94. 10.3171/2009.7.JNS09363.

  23. 23.

    Rockswold SB, Rockswold GL, Defillo A: Hyperbaric oxygen in traumatic brain injury. Neurol Res. 2007, 29 (2): 162-72. 10.1179/016164107X181798. Review

  24. 24.

    Rockswold SB, Rockswold GL, Defillo A: Hyperbaric oxygen in traumatic brain injury. Neurol Res. 2007, 29 (2): 162-72. 10.1179/016164107X181798. Review

  25. 25.

    Hardy P, Johnston KM, De Beaumont L, Montgomery DL, Lecomte JM, Soucy JP, Bourbonnais D, Lassonde M: Pilot case study of the therapeutic potential of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on chronic brain injury. J Neurol Sci. 2007, 253 (1-2): 94-105. 10.1016/j.jns.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Jan 16

  26. 26.

    Shi XY, Tang ZQ, Sun D, He XJ: Evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders following traumatic brain injury. Chin Med J (Engl). 2006, 119 (23): 1978-82.

  27. 27.

    Golden Z, Golden CJ, Neubauer RA: Improving neuropsychological function after chronic brain injury with hyperbaric oxygen. Disabil Rehabil. 2006, 28 (22): 1379-86. 10.1080/09638280600638364.

  28. 28.

    Collins MW, Lovell MR, Mckeag DB: Current Issues in managing sports-related concussion. JAMA. 1999, 282: 2283-2285. 10.1001/jama.282.24.2283.

  29. 29.

    Collins MW, Grindel SH, Lovell MR, Dede DE, Moser DJ, Phalin BR, Nogle S, Wasik M, Cordry D, Sears SF, Nicolette G, Indelicato P, McKeag D: Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players. JAMA. 1999, 282: 989-991. 10.1001/jama.282.10.989.

  30. 30.

    Iverson GL, Lovell MR, Collins MW: Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003, 17: 460-467.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The two patients in this case report were treated at the Hyperbaric Oxygen Clinic in Sacramento with the assistance and dedication of Mike Greenhalgh and Bryan Burke.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. 404 Brunn School Rd D, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA
    • Kenneth P Stoller
Authors
  1. Kenneth P Stoller
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth P Stoller.

Additional information

Competing interests

Dr. Stoller is President of the International Hyperbaric Medical Association, and a principal investigator on the International Hyperbaric Medical Foundation's National Brain Injury Rescue & Rehabilitation Project. He is medical director of the New Hope Clinic (Santa Monica), San Francisco Institute for Hyperbaric Medicine, the Hyperbaric Oxygen Clinic of Sacramento, and the Hyperbaric Medical Center of New Mexico.

Authors' contributions

KPS supervised the hyperbaric oxygen treatments and in case two supervised the administration of the IMPACT test. KPS also drafted the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoller, K.P. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (1.5 ATA) in treating sports related TBI/CTE: two case reports. Med Gas Res 1, 17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-9912-1-17

Download citation

Keywords

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Patient
  • Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
  • National Football League
  • SPECT Brain Imaging

Medical Gas Research

ISSN: 2045-9912

Contact us